Skip to main content

Gaming adapted Web 2.0 elements EARLY

Hi all, I concluded last week's post with a diatribe about MySpace. I'd like to discuss how I interacted with and simultaneously built online communities around games in the mid to late 2000's. Specifically, I'm talking about games like RuneScape and World of Warcraft, as well as online services like Xbox Live. These services were all released earlier than I was able to play them: Runescape in 2001, Xbox Live in 2002, and World of Warcraft in 2004. These services were perhaps my experience with Web 2.0. I was interacting with them before MySpace and Facebook emerged, which were later than these game services. I'll mainly speak on World of Warcraft, but all of these services really offered the same thing: virtual communities that you could interact with and collaborate with in-game. Typed chat was always available, as was voice chat (more prevalent in Xbox Live). World of Warcraft was so exciting to me at the time because it was the first time I'd seen a game with these online capabilities. I could play autonomously, collaborate with others, or use the game to talk to others while I was doing my own thing. 



This was a stark contrast to my experience with gaming up to this point, where if I wanted multiplayer components, I'd be sitting next to someone and looking at the same screen.  I was introduced to these gaming and Web 2.0 elements early enough in my lifetime, where I was right on the precipice of being a digital native- "parallel processing and multitasking" (Prensky, 2001). Because I was acclimated to those massively multiplayer online role-playing game (MMORPG) elements early on, I feel like I'm still a native rather than an immigrant when I have students discuss their experiences online with Minecraft, Fortnite, and Roblox. I feel like, it's the same thing, just a different generation. It is on a massive scale in a more intimate digital environment, though. I'll paraphrase because I can't recall the exact quote, but I saw a TikTok earlier this week where an interviewed development psychologist mentioned the dangers of Roblox, saying it was like dropping your child off in a virtual world that was '5 times the size of Tokyo'. 

I'll attach the reel here: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYh1_XDuXtb/


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Does the digital native/immigrant dichotomy work?

     I felt, as I was reading the Prenska article, that my knee-jerk reaction was that I was fortunate to have grown up at the right time (mid-late 2000s), when Web 2.0 features were coming into mainstream culture. I was learning them like everyone else, and I had an advantage. My reaction to the digital immigrants was that these were relatively older users I saw on Facebook, either using ChatGPT for the first time and sharing a tacky image (see Figure 1), or exclusively using their online interactions in my local ‘rants, raves, and reviews’ to initiate arguments. My brain's intuition couldn't have been right. Is there a right  way to interact with online communities? That's what constitutes me as a digital native? Are these users who use Facebook and AI in those other ways digital immigrants? Although it's a niche of folks who argue on Facebook, they still use that social media website as it was intended: to connect and interact with others online. So, what is ...

Prodigy Slander won't be tolerated....well, maybe

 Happy Summer, educators. In Florida, anyway! While embarking on my Reddit Challenge, I came across a post on r/edtech about the learning game Prodigy, which has role-playing elements that I've used in my own math instruction. I figured I'd post my initial reactions to this article and talk about how EdTech in the classroom, and more specifically, game-based learning, has been more divisive than we think.  https://web.archive.org/web/20260516165144/https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/2026/05/homework-video-games-ed-tech/687198/     The author of this Atlantic  article, Will Oremus, begins and ends the piece with observations of his son playing the Prodigy learning platform that many classrooms are adopting and integrating into their curricula. From my personal experience in a niche example in 1 school district out of the nation's 18,000ish, Prodigy is used more in elementary contexts (K-5) and then tapers off at the middle and high school levels. The author's...

Understanding Hashtags: From my insufferable, 2011 Instagram Posts, to Legit Instructional Materials

I've never used hashtags to filter my virtual consent consumption until recently. My first attempts at tagging my Instagram posts... 15 years ago... were used to provide additional information about the post and, of course, for comedic effect. They were not used for the practical purpose of having my posts sorted by content. Tags' prevalence in the early 2010s seemed irrelevant to me, personally. At the time, since I had mostly used YouTube and Facebook, tags weren't available until Twitter came along. YouTube was easily categorized by content creators using keywords, and Facebook's search engine found keywords mentioned in posts. I never explicitly saw the #. Now, when X (FKA Twitter) came to my attention in the early-to-late 2010s, the 'tweets' stood out to me as a unique format: a short, concise update followed by a hashtag. On mobile, the hashtags were always linked and took the user to an organized subsection of popular/'hot' posts that contained th...