Flinterud's article posits that algorithms don't create folklore. Humans still create stories, jokes, traditions, rumors, and memes. But algorithms influence which of those stories become visible and continue circulating. Below are memes that were and still are, in some spaces, viral. Your respective algorithms are probably why you've seen one over the other, or neither. I quickly surveyed my wife on this, and she'd never seen the first meme, which I presumed was the more popular one. But she said she saw the Kermit meme last week on her Instagram feed from the dark side, instructing her to forget about cooking and to DoorDash. She did DoorDash, indeed.
Bucher's article introduces the idea of the algorithmic imaginary: users assume rewards for posting content at certain times of the day (I'm looking accusatively at my wife again as I type this), using certain words and tags, and using trending filters or formats. For example, in Bucher's article, the musician learns that posts with certain wording, timing, and engagement patterns receive more visibility. He's trying to create content that the algorithm "holds onto" rather than letting it slip away unnoticed. The thing is, the entire online culture (everyone) is the folks that define what the shapes of the holes are and what gets caught in the colander. I can't imagine everyone knows what beliefs are objectively true with an online culture that alters the algorithm of what content we see moment-to-moment... it helps to be chronically online, I'm sure. Those people try to learn what the colander catches and then reshape themselves so they won't be discarded. I just wish everyone would collectively shift the colander to let '67' fall into the sink.

Comments
Post a Comment